Scientists' Meetings: Collegial versus Positional
نویسندگان
چکیده
منابع مشابه
Agitated delirium versus positional asphyxia.
To the Editor." The recent article by Stratton et al [May 1995;25:710-712] describes two violent and combative patients who were placed, prone, in hobble restraints and died while being transported and monitored by paramedical personnel. The authors are to be commended for bringing this problem to the attention of emergency physicians. Unfortunately, they appear to have confused agitated deliri...
متن کاملLegal Doctrine on Collegial Courts
Appellate courts, which have the most control over legal doctrine, tend to operate through collegial (multimember) decision making. How does this collegiality affect their choice of legal doctrine? Can decisions by appellate courts be expected to result in a meaningful collegial rule? How do such collegial rules differ from the rules of individual judges? We explore these questions and show tha...
متن کاملCollegial Ethics: Supporting Our Colleagues
The goal of collegial ethics is to actively support our colleagues and to develop the skills needed to do so. While collegial interactions are key for our careers, there is little or no training in this. Many of our actions and reactions with our colleagues are instinctive. Human nature has evolved to be self-protective, but many evolved and automatic responses to others are not always in the b...
متن کاملDisagreements on Collegial Courts : A
How do disagreements between judges on collegial (multimember) courts affect legal policy? We address this question by developing an account of the nature of judicial disagreements in the case-space model of judicial choice. We distinguish between different types of disagreement, from disagreements about case facts to disagreements about how legal rules should treat varying case facts, and cons...
متن کاملQualitative versus Quantitative Evaluation of Scientists' Impact: A Medical Toxicology Tale
Evaluation of scientists working in a specific area of science is necessary, as they may strive for same limited resources, grants and academic promotions. One of the most common and accepted methods of assessing the performance and impact of a scientist is calculating the number of citations for their publications. However, such method suffer from certain shortcomings. It has become more and m...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
ژورنال
عنوان ژورنال: Science
سال: 1976
ISSN: 0036-8075,1095-9203
DOI: 10.1126/science.193.4251.361